By Michel C. Doré, MStJ, PhD, B.Sc.N., PCP, CEM, CGU
Since 2006 the emergency management practitioners in Quebec have regrouped within theAssociation de sécurité civile du Québec (ascq.org). Strong of its 285 members, the association represents the emergency managers with governments, municipalities, educational institutions and other organisations.
Among its activities, ASCQ manages a provincial EM professional certification program, organises conferences and webinars. The ASCQ partners every year with RECO Quebec, our business continuity association (reco-quebec.org) and CRAIM, our industrial accident prevention council (craim.ca) to organise an emergency management exhibition in conjunction with the Colloque de la sécurité civile du Québec, our provincial EM conference.
To foster partnerships among the emergency management/search and rescue volunteer groups, ASCQ organises, since 2015, various training activities and full scale exercises (video). These activities involve volunteers from Saint-John Ambulance, Salvation Army, Canadian Red Cross, Association des bénévoles en recherche et sauvetage du Québec, Canadian Coast Guard Auxiliary, Sauvetage et recherche aériens du Québec and the Radio-Amateur Québec inc.
We are currently planning the 2019 edition of our Rendez-vousin the Ottawa region. We hope to mobilise the volunteers from both Quebec and Ontario to respond to a joint event happening simultaneously on both sides of the Ottawa River. Both the cities of Gatineau and Ottawa support this upcoming exercise.
By Christina Baker
As members of a collective professional association it is important that our membership as well as our invested time and money translate into benefits that will directly enhance our abilities and awareness as professionals as well as benefit the communities in which we live and work. When asked about how emergency management professionals benefit from a membership with the Ontario Association of Emergency Managers (OAEM), Jason Reid (Professional Development Coordinator) responded, “The answer is in the mission”.
One of the core components of the OAEM mission “to enhance our profession by offering opportunities for professional development, advocacy, mentoring, community collaboration and networking” is professional development. Professional development is a crucial element to the emergency management profession, not only in supporting our current roles, but also as part of longer term career development and in furthering the field in which we operate.
The effectiveness of professional development requires thoughtful planning and execution and OAEM has committed itself to providing events in order to offer its members and all participants valuable learning experiences and unique opportunities that will enhance their knowledge base and skill sets.
To kick-off the New Year, OAEM and the Institution of Fire Engineers have teamed up in an effort to bring together professionals from the diverse field of emergency management to discuss barn fires emergency preparedness and recovery “After the Fire”, vehicle accidents involving livestock, the management of deadstock and emergency response. A common theme among these presentations were lessons learned, future improvement, and the release of a new initiative involving First Responder Safety.
From every incident or emergency event, there are lessons to be learned that if given attention have the potential to improve upon the outcome of the next incident. The application of lessons learned to emergency management programs, emergency exercises, and training initiatives enables us as to improve our preparedness for future scenarios, create safer communities in which we live and work as well as strengthen our abilities as emergency professionals based on our collective past experiences. The below links are the highlights from our most recent PD session.
Please join us March 1st at our next event “Specialized Teams in Emergency Management” as we embark on this exciting professional development endeavour.
Key Survey Findings: Perceived Benefit & Willingness to Uptake Membership in a Professional Association for Emergency Managers
By Moira Hennebury
The biggest challenge in growing membership is articulating the value proposition. Cognizant that students and recent graduates represent the largest growing prospective member base of any professional association, I sought to understand the perceived benefit, expectations, willingness, and ability of this population group to uptake membership in an association for emergency management professionals.
It must be stated that while I am a member of several professional associations, I do not serve on any board or committee. I decided to undertake this small project because I believe today’s students and recent graduates have the tools, courage, and motivation to effect great change. Young professionals offer a rich and diverse knowledge base, flexibility, and a commitment to innovation. This cannot be overstated. Our generation will have a powerful and transformative impact on the trajectory of emergency management.
To gather the perspectives of students and recent graduates, I conducted a short online survey from January 25 to 30, 2019. Participation in the survey was voluntary and allowed respondents to maintain their anonymity. The survey was intended for current undergraduate, graduate, doctoral, and professional certificate students and recent graduates of an emergency management or a related program in Ontario. The survey had an organic reach of 54 responses in five days. The level of positive engagement demonstrates that students and recent graduates can identify and articulate a clear set of expectations as prospective members.
Curiously, relatively few respondents currently hold membership in either of the two most prominent associations for emergency management professionals. Of the 54 total respondents, only 35% (19) were members of the Ontario Association of Emergency Managers (OAEM). Of the respondents who are not presently members, nearly half had once held membership with the association. This statistic underscores the challenge of member retention.
Membership in the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM-Canada) was similarly low for the population surveyed. Of the 54 respondents, only 26% (14) were current members of the IAEM. 15% of non-members once held membership.
I was curious to understand why membership was remarkably low despite the fact that both associations offer free or reduced member rates for students. There is a longstanding perception that cost is the primary factor in a student or recent graduate’s decision to uptake membership in a professional association. This perception was challenged by the survey results. In fact, the results show a myriad of factors relating to both ability and willingness to uptake membership. The most frequently cited reasons for not choosing to uptake membership in either association are summarized in the table below.
It is interesting to note that a difference in the perceived value of membership between OAEM and IAEM-Canada was not distinguishable. For both
Despite low membership uptake and average levels of perceived value, opportunities for improved engagement exist for both associations. For instance, 5.7% of OAEM non-members indicated that they intend on becoming a member in 2019, while 34.3% more are undecided. The outlook was similarly positive for the IAEM-Canada. 7.5% of non-members indicated that they intend on becoming a member in 2019 and 47.5% are undecided.
It is my hope that the survey results enclosed will serve as a call to action.
Students and recent graduates are drawn to professional development activities that allow them to expand their competencies and skill set. Moreover, they are interested in opportunities that will allow them to guide and shape the future of emergency management. The most important benefits of membership in a professional association are ranked below. This survey section was mandatory for all 54 respondents. Respondents were asked to rank each benefit from 1 to 5, with 1 representing “not important” and 5 representing “very important”. The percentage assigned to each benefit category indicates the total percentage of respondents who indicated the benefit was either “important” or “very important” to them.
- Continuing education (e.g. multi-day courses) 87.0%
- Professional development events (e.g. workshops and webinars) 83.3%
- Formal networking events (e.g. roundtables on emerging issues) 81.5%
- Access to a job board 77.8%
- Access to conferences 70.4%
- Access to exclusive “member’s only” content or resources 61.1%
- The ability to join committees or special interest workgroups 55.6%
- Access to a mentorship program 53.7%
- Access to discounted products and services 51.2%
- Access to informal networking events (e.g. dinners, galas) 48.1%
- Opportunities to receive feedback on your resume 40.1%
It is my hope that this undertaking allowed participants to think deeply about their role and commitment to both personal and professional growth as emergency managers. I am encouraged by the conversation this survey has evoked and I look forward to how this discussion can be operationalized to both increase member engagement and deliver a better end product to current and prospective members.
Thank you to all who participated.
This survey allowed respondents to maintain their anonymity. A benefit of this method is that it encourages respondents to provide truthful responses. Several disadvantages of this approach exist, including
The Ontario Association of Emergency Managers (OAEM) provides students in post-secondary certificate, diploma, degree or master programs in emergency management with the opportunity to receive an award to recognize their achievements during each academic year.
Awards are available in the following categories:
- The Brian Hook Memorial Award –
Honoursthe memory of Major Brian Hook (CD) through making an award to a student who has made significant contributions to the field of Emergency Management while maintaining a high level of academic excellence. ($1,500)
- A. Normand Academic Award – Students will submit a 1,200 – 1,500-word essay on any topic relating to emergency management and business continuity. All essays must include an abstract and APA formatting. ($1,000)
- President’s Award – This award will go to a professional who has gone back to school to study
emergency management/business continuity in order to upgrade/change their profession. This will be based on their grade point average (GPA) and any contributions theyhave made to the field. ($500)
The deadline for applications is Friday April 12th, 2019 and the award presentations will be made at the Ontario Association of Emergency Managers’ Annual General Meeting on May 15th 2019 at Centennial College in Scarborough, ON.
Completed application forms and supplementary documentation should be sent by email before the deadline to firstname.lastname@example.org. All applications are reviewed by the OAEM Board of Directors and the OAEM Awards Committee, who will then decide on the award winners.
We look forward to receiving applications for these prestigious and well-respected awards. If you have any questions about the awards, please email email@example.com. Good luck!
By Alain Normand
When IAEM Canada sent out the notice that nominations where open for the executive of the IAEM Ontario region, I was very surprised as I had no idea there was an intent on creating such a region. After a few calls and discussions with some people at IAEM, I found out that seven IAEM members residing in Ontario had signed a request to IAEM Canada to create an Ontario region and that based on the IAEM bylaws, the executive of IAEM Canada had to follow through on the request.
Since there had been no discussion on the topic, I decided to organize a town hall meeting and invite Ontario members of IAEM and OAEM to talk about it. The event was held in Brampton on January 22 in the morning. About 25 people attended in person and another dozen or so were on the conference call. As one person said, having such a response with only a seven day notice is a clear demonstration of the commitment of the professionals to the future of emergency management in Ontario and Canada.
After receiving clarification on the process by Greg Solecki, president of IAEM Canada, we were informed that the list of people whose nominations had been put forward for the executive of a new IAEM Ontario would be sent out on Monday January 28 and IAEM members would have three weeks to submit their vote.
The discussion started on the pros and cons of having an IAEM Ontario and the perceived competition with OAEM. After many comments on this and much talk about aiming for collaboration, the general feeling of the group was that having two association in the province was not necessarily a bad thing. In fact, repeatedly it was discussed that having an Ontario voice at the national level could bring some positive outcomes for the profession.
The OAEM position as stated by the president Mike O’Brien, was open to having an IAEM Ontario region as long as there was no duplication of efforts. OAEM caters to the emergency management community in Ontario and has done much to advance the professional development, student engagement, and mentorship aspect of the community. IAEM in turn is seen as the certification channel and the advocacy agency to promote the profession within governments and external agencies. If the new Ontario region sticks to this mandate, there should be no real competition. We did point out that for newcomers to the field and for students, having to choose between OAEM and IAEM Ontario may be difficult, especially for new graduates who will have limited funds to become members of both associations.
What transpired eventually from the discussion was that this was a done deal. We had no authority or means to stop the creation of this region. In fact, we didn’t even need seven signatures, only one signature would have been sufficient to initiate the process. The discussion turned to the process itself.
It was clear that OAEM had nothing to do in the next phase. The discussion turned solely to IAEM and there was general dissatisfaction with the way the creation of the region happened. While Greg Solecki and the executive of the IAEM Canada followed the bylaws and the rules to the letter, never was there any consultation on the desire of the emergency management profession in Ontario. Following the rules is one thing; catering to the will of the members is another. This is about doing the right thing rather than doing things right.
There was anger and resentment expressed towards the seven people who submitted the request that they took it upon themselves to speak on behalf of the other 143 or so members of IAEM residing in Ontario. These people who have yet to come forward, are creating a group based on unknowns, with no clear indication of reasons, no justification for the need of such an association, and no information on the roles and responsibilities they intend to play. Will this body collaborate with existing agencies? Will it actually carry at the national level the will of the Ontario members? There was a lot of doubt of this. If these people didn’t even take the time to ask member’s opinion prior to creating the region, what guarantees will we have that they will speak on our behalf once they are elected?
In all, whatever this Ontario region will be is off to a very bad start. Most of the people in the room and a few on the call held some ill feelings towards this whole process. I can also attest to discussions I had with other members prior to the meeting over phone calls and e-mails in the days preceding, and the same feeling was expressed numerous times by people who were unable to attend the meeting.
As I said, this is a done deal, we can’t do anything about it. The process to get there stinks, the people who put this forward didn’t even have the courage to step up and give us their reasoning, and we still have no idea what these people are aiming to accomplish.
I do not intend to put my name forward for this executive. I’ve done my stint on boards and I’m leaving this to others.
However, be assured of one thing. I will be watching. If this IAEM Ontario intends to speak on my behalf, they better say what I want them to say. I will attend every IAEM Ontario AGM, I will read every minute of every IAEM Ontario and IAEM Canada meeting, and I will search for every sentence where our will as Ontario EM professionals is presented. I will be on the new president’s back –and the rest of the executive- should they diverge from the wishes of my fellow members. If you submitted your nomination already, you better be ready for this.
I also encourage all IAEM Canada members in Ontario to be on the watch. I demand transparency and openness, I aim for accountability, and so should all of you. This whole process started behind our backs, without consultation, without our input and with none of those concerned ever showing their card. If IAEM Ontario is sincere in its intention of being the voice of Ontario EM professionals, this better change quickly.
The bylaws also contain an article 9 which is about dispute. I will reread this closely and I may use it in the future should I not be satisfied in the integrity of the people at the helm.
I want to close by reiterating that I am a member of both OAEM and IAEM Canada but I write this as an emergency management professional in my own words and with my own opinions. Those in no way reflect the opinions of either OAEM or IAEM Canada.
Going forward, let’s change the course, and do the right thing.
NGO Alliance of Ontario Guiding Principles
· Maintain a reliable, credible and respected Alliance for members, municipalities, the Province and other stakeholders to access and share
· Provide NGO Executive members the opportunity to participate in the emergency response network committees and initiatives within Ontario
· Redirect calls to NGO Council members and other stakeholders for support and to provide assistance in times of disaster and emergencies
· Develop working relationships with other NGO members, municipalities, the Province and additional stakeholders
· Broadly communicate NGO member capacity by maintaining a current NGO Alliance of Ontario Handbook, Continuum Infographic and website
Dear Colleagues, fellow Emergency Management Professionals,
You may have seen the communications from the IAEM Canada board asking for nominations to the executive position of the IAEM Ontario Region. If you are like me and interested in the future of the emergency management profession, you probably had questions about this Ontario Region. I did, so I asked and found out thatseven Ontario emergency management professionals with good standing as membersof IAEM Canada had sent a request for the creation of this IAEM Ontario Region.
The IAEM Bylaw allows this as long as there is no existing region in the same province and as long as there
My concern is on how this will impact the profession in Ontario. I would like to have a discussion on this with as many of you as possible. I especially would like to hear the reasoning of the seven people who submitted the request. I do not know who they are and the IAEM Board respects the privacy of its members.
I am neither on the board of IAEM Canada nor
Please note that I will not tolerate the negative criticism of either IAEM or
To get an idea of how many people will attend, please send me a quick rsvp e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org
Town Hall meeting on the future of the emergency management profession in Ontario
January22, 2019, 09h00,
Century Gardens Community Centre,
340 Vodden Street East,Brampton
Alain Normand, Emergency Management Professional